<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bit Of Fun: Where Now?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.atheistbus.org.uk/bit-of-fun-where-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.atheistbus.org.uk/bit-of-fun-where-now/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:02:37 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rohan</title>
		<link>http://www.atheistbus.org.uk/bit-of-fun-where-now/comment-page-1/#comment-603</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atheistcampaign.org/?p=283#comment-603</guid>
		<description>I would love to see an Atheist message on the electronic billboard on Cardiff high street! Every time I walk past it seems to have another bloody bible quote, and I&#039;d really love for a bit of balance on the sign...

Also, my mate just got me wondering how much it would cost to setup a happy meal promo? Who doesn&#039;t want a Richard Dawkins doll and an Atheist lunch box?! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see an Atheist message on the electronic billboard on Cardiff high street! Every time I walk past it seems to have another bloody bible quote, and I&#8217;d really love for a bit of balance on the sign&#8230;</p>
<p>Also, my mate just got me wondering how much it would cost to setup a happy meal promo? Who doesn&#8217;t want a Richard Dawkins doll and an Atheist lunch box?! <img src='http://www.atheistbus.org.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo Graves</title>
		<link>http://www.atheistbus.org.uk/bit-of-fun-where-now/comment-page-1/#comment-602</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo Graves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 12:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atheistcampaign.org/?p=283#comment-602</guid>
		<description>Coule we have poster paccks available for supporters to buy so that they can put them up in local towns? I think the God-squad do something similar. Also pin badges would be excellent, I&#039;d love to play spot the supporter when out and about</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coule we have poster paccks available for supporters to buy so that they can put them up in local towns? I think the God-squad do something similar. Also pin badges would be excellent, I&#8217;d love to play spot the supporter when out and about</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Bloom</title>
		<link>http://www.atheistbus.org.uk/bit-of-fun-where-now/comment-page-1/#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atheistcampaign.org/?p=283#comment-591</guid>
		<description>Agnostic: Dawkins and Harris would disagree. In their eyes, a true atheist doesn&#039;t believe there is NO god, just that the known facts strongly suggest that there isn&#039;t one and thus it&#039;s not worth considering. One could argue that this makes one a Skeptic as opposed to an Atheist, but I say the two classifications are equal. I would also argue that an Atheist who takes the zero-probability stance is as much a narrow-minded fundamentalist as is a 100%-probability Monotheist. 

In any case, the point of the &quot;Probably&quot; on the sign is justified in order to get around advertising legislation, and the point of the sign is to enlighten those who are already skeptical. There&#039;s no hope converting fundamentalists as they are by definition unshakable in their opinion (aka faith). (The same holds true on either side of the argument)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agnostic: Dawkins and Harris would disagree. In their eyes, a true atheist doesn&#8217;t believe there is NO god, just that the known facts strongly suggest that there isn&#8217;t one and thus it&#8217;s not worth considering. One could argue that this makes one a Skeptic as opposed to an Atheist, but I say the two classifications are equal. I would also argue that an Atheist who takes the zero-probability stance is as much a narrow-minded fundamentalist as is a 100%-probability Monotheist. </p>
<p>In any case, the point of the &#8220;Probably&#8221; on the sign is justified in order to get around advertising legislation, and the point of the sign is to enlighten those who are already skeptical. There&#8217;s no hope converting fundamentalists as they are by definition unshakable in their opinion (aka faith). (The same holds true on either side of the argument)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goffredo</title>
		<link>http://www.atheistbus.org.uk/bit-of-fun-where-now/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>Goffredo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atheistcampaign.org/?p=283#comment-588</guid>
		<description>Probably :-) the best cause I &#039;ve ever donated for.

Today a bus... Tomorrow:

http://mapage.noos.fr/goffredo/various/vatican.jpeg

Best Regards,

G.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably <img src='http://www.atheistbus.org.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  the best cause I &#8216;ve ever donated for.</p>
<p>Today a bus&#8230; Tomorrow:</p>
<p><a href="http://mapage.noos.fr/goffredo/various/vatican.jpeg" rel="nofollow">http://mapage.noos.fr/goffredo/various/vatican.jpeg</a></p>
<p>Best Regards,</p>
<p>G.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon</title>
		<link>http://www.atheistbus.org.uk/bit-of-fun-where-now/comment-page-1/#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atheistcampaign.org/?p=283#comment-580</guid>
		<description>I believe that the likelyhood of god existing is about the same as the likelyhood of Santa and the Easter Bunny car-pooling to work.  Not likely, but not disprovable either.  I&#039;m not arrogant enough to suggest that something is 100% certain, but it&#039;s enough for me to say it close to impossible as you can get.  That&#039;s the atheist position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that the likelyhood of god existing is about the same as the likelyhood of Santa and the Easter Bunny car-pooling to work.  Not likely, but not disprovable either.  I&#8217;m not arrogant enough to suggest that something is 100% certain, but it&#8217;s enough for me to say it close to impossible as you can get.  That&#8217;s the atheist position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agnostic</title>
		<link>http://www.atheistbus.org.uk/bit-of-fun-where-now/comment-page-1/#comment-579</link>
		<dc:creator>Agnostic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atheistcampaign.org/?p=283#comment-579</guid>
		<description>Simon, if you need statistics to back up your hypothesis of there being no god then since you cannot prove this with absolute 100% certainty it stands to reason you must accept even the smallest possibility he/she exists. Ergo, you are not an atheist. Have some backbone and conviction in what you claim to believe (not not believe) in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon, if you need statistics to back up your hypothesis of there being no god then since you cannot prove this with absolute 100% certainty it stands to reason you must accept even the smallest possibility he/she exists. Ergo, you are not an atheist. Have some backbone and conviction in what you claim to believe (not not believe) in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
